|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Doug Allen
It is the not the size it is the cut and the edge. The cutting process for T206s and other vintage cards is much different than it is today. The problem is too many collectors depend way too much on whether or not a card measures up as opposed to learning what the cut and edge should look like on a T206. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| e91-c, card size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 09-21-2006 07:22 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 10:48 AM |
| now you see it now it's smaller- scan size | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 01-16-2006 09:10 AM |
| smaller card toploaders? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 11-15-2005 03:36 AM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 09:40 PM |