 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5
02-03-2002, 01:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Confused about grading vs. authenticating
Posted By: Plastic Dog
Bottom line is that I think such cards should still be "graded" - only give a POOR with or without qualifier. Otherwise, we will spend the rest of our lives arguing about whether an AUTHENTIC card is really EX-MT or VG, which may rest on whether a blemish is a light print mark or an ironed out crease. You will never be certain in many instances. Far too many problems for minimal benefit. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AM CONFUSED ABOUT NEW EBAY FEEDBACK SYSTEM | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 03-30-2008 04:32 PM |
| T206 pops - PSA website - confused | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-22-2007 11:06 AM |
| Confused on Card Values?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 11-17-2007 04:07 PM |
| Confused over a Nadja | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-17-2006 01:28 PM |
| very confused seller | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 12-13-2002 01:00 PM |
Threaded Mode