![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: john wojak
I think the 50s cards look okay, but I am leery about the Ruth and Gehrig Goudeys. To me, the borders look a little too wide and too white for comfort, especially the Ruth. Plus, I have a beat up Gehrig '33 on my desk at work and comparing it to the scan, the colors on the scan are a little too dark (especially the bat and the face), which is the way reprints are. Get a money back guarantee or, better yet, get them evaluated by either a grading company or a respected third party expert before you fork over the bucks. They could be fine (it could just be a funny scan making the borders look so white), but I am not comfortable with them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
are these authentic cards ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 03-07-2009 03:58 PM |
Should Rebacked cards be graded as Authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 24 | 09-23-2007 07:36 PM |
PSA Authentic cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 08-17-2007 07:37 AM |
authentic cards??? Help Please. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-16-2006 10:51 PM |
Cracker Jack Cards Authentic? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 11-10-2005 11:48 AM |