|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: jay behrens
My biggest gripe with grading companies is that if they find flaws under magnification, then they should disclose these. Otherwise you left wondering why card got hammered on it's grade. I have an Indian card with blue boarders and looks spectacular, yet got only a 60. I have 1971 Topps cards with mroe corner wear tahn this card has, and they got graded anywhere between 84-92, so I would love to know why this particular card got a 60 becuase I can't find anything under magnification that would lower the grade on this card so much. My only thought is that since it is an issue they have never graded before, that they are unaware that the specks int eh paper are part of the paper stock and not print defects/spots. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| CubanBaseballCards.com Auction Ends Tonight (Nov. 7th) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-08-2008 09:45 AM |
| 1948 Swell Gum Sports Thrills Greatest Inning -Phila As card F/S | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-30-2006 08:50 PM |
| Hartford PAPERMANIA show Jan 6/7th | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 12-30-2006 10:54 AM |
| Mile High Card Co. Dec. 7th Auction/ Catalog | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-21-2005 10:07 PM |
| 19thCenturyOnly Auction Ending This Thursday, August 7th | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 08-05-2003 02:49 PM |