|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: PASJD
I agree fully that this episdode -- and others I have heard about -- gives one some pause about the competence of grading companies. What concerns me most, frankly, is that the volume of cards they review suggests that they have very little time to spend inspecting any given card, although one hopes that on issues more likely to be vulnerable to alteration for economic gain -- prewar cards and expensive cards generally -- they take more time. However, it is an imperfect world, and it seems to me especially given that most cards today are purchased without visual inspection that reliance on third party grading is far better than the alternative. It also appears from the example given in this thread that a grading company will acknowledge an obvious mistake, which further reduces one's risk. Just one man's thoughts. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: T206 Ty Cobb back and Herzog (Boston) rare back | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 12-09-2008 01:29 AM |
| T207 Irving Lewis - with Tolstoi back -- simply amazing! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-01-2007 01:41 AM |
| Doctored Cobb Reprint $400+ | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 04-21-2006 08:21 PM |
| Simply amazing - the undoctored Cobb is in !! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-16-2004 02:12 PM |
| 2002 T206 Cobb w/ Bazooka back vs. T206 Cobb w/ Ty Cobb back | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 03-13-2002 06:40 PM |