|
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: warshawlaw
John B. California: That there are relatively few 9-10 T206s in terms of overall percentages does not disprove concerns about altered higher grade cards. First of all, you did not count 7s and 8s. Anything over ex-mt from that era commands big registry bucks and is nice enough looking to be considered for alterations, especially hairline crease removals and stain removals. Add in the 7s and 8s and where are we? Second, you can pull any single set out of the air as an example but accumulate that over all prewar sets of all cards over ex-mt and there is quite a hefty number. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 10-16-2007 10:10 AM |
| Troubling Auction Purchase | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 08-16-2006 03:39 PM |
| Your hobby doesn't do anything. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 07-17-2006 03:10 PM |
| When It Was A Hobby | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-06-2005 11:17 AM |
| When it was a hobby . . . | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-01-2005 08:15 PM |