 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15
09-06-2006, 12:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
ACC designations
Posted By: Glen V
I can see fixing the Old Mill Cabinet designation (which can't affect many people), but question other changes to the ACC. Does E92 really need subtypes? Then what about all the other issues with multiple backs. T206s are really three sets, should that be spelled out? If the existing ACC does get changed, might as well make the R302 M.P. & Co. a "W" card too. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACC modification | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 05-10-2007 01:15 AM |
| Need help on designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-31-2006 02:03 PM |
| Question re: "ACC Designations" | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-12-2005 09:49 AM |
| T206 Willis Overprint w/Two Factory Designations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 02-27-2005 01:00 PM |
| What do the Factory designations on T cards actually mean? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-24-2003 11:09 PM |
Threaded Mode