![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Posted By: steve yawitz
I don't think it's a problem at all. Heck, I think these discrepancies between eye appeal and third-party grade afford average collectors like myself the opportunity to pick up really cool cards within our means. There's so much variability within the lower grades that the flaw(s) responsible for a 20 or 2 or whatever might not matter on our own idiosyncratic grading scales. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
As things evolve....your current focus on collecting pre-war? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 93 | 02-19-2009 01:11 PM |
Is the Grading System Broken? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 328 | 07-11-2007 10:09 PM |
A new grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 10-15-2006 12:40 PM |
It is quite easy to voice your dissatisfaction with current grading standards, | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 07-25-2006 11:51 AM |
What's wrong with photo cards grading standards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 12-29-2005 09:16 PM |