|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Paul
I agree that grading companies typically deal too harshly with minor paper loss on the reverse. I just wonder why an exception was made for this card. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Grading Question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-13-2007 10:36 AM |
| P2 Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-28-2006 03:41 PM |
| SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
| Opinions on Professional Grading Services | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-08-2006 09:54 PM |
| Another grading question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2004 08:00 AM |