|
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Posted By: Chris Counts
That's a great question. It seems to me that if Bowman made a '49 football set, it would probably have looked like the '49 baseball set. But I'll bet their baseball cards far outsold their football cards, and Bowman was too busy to make a football set in the summer of '49 because they a) were adding a late series to the '49 baseball set, and b) were busy gearing up for the following baseball season, when they would unveil the first of a series of much more ambitious and attractive sets. I've long believed the Bowman sets from '50-'53 are among the finest baseball cards ever produced (the Bowman '50-52 football are equally amazing), and it must have taken a great effort to create and reproduce the first set in particular of such high quality images. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1948 Leaf vs. 1949 Leaf? | Archive | Football Cards Forum | 3 | 03-31-2009 05:54 AM |
| WTB 1948 and 1949 Bowman or Leaf autographed rookies of the following: | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-25-2008 09:02 PM |
| WTB 1948 Bowman Yogi Berra, 1949 Bowman Duke Snider | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 11-28-2008 07:42 PM |
| 1949 Leaf | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 6 | 05-30-2008 02:06 PM |
| 1948 or 1949 Leaf | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 01-16-2008 07:32 AM |