![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim,
I will check my remaining 1908-09 Ogdens tonight and post some back scans. Gimme a few hours, as today's my B-Day and, as such, I can't get to the cards until everyone but me is asleep! ![]()
__________________
www.MDsportscards.blogspot.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim,
See 4 scans below: two 1908 Sullivans, one 1909 Johnson, and one 1915 Carpentier. While it appears that there is a cream Sullivan and a white Sullivan, I think it's just aging, as I have several other 1908s and the back toning varies from white to cream, depending upon aging, I guess. Also, you will notice that the backs of the 1908 and 1909 are slightly different. The 1915 is written in green. Hope this helps. ![]() 1908 Sullivan ![]() Another 1908 Sullivan ![]() 1909 Johnson ![]() 1915 Carpentier
__________________
www.MDsportscards.blogspot.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike
Are those Suillivans' marked that same on the flip? I think that is a pretty drastict difference and my gut says that is what the cause of the white vs cream back is. The question still remains if that was a intended difference or just aging. I don't think it's just aging though. It would be great to ask anyone who might have some other ideas. I have attels that would make your sullivans' as far as colors of the back. James G |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Jim,
The PSA label does NOT differentiate between cream and white on the Sullivans. I think the "white" Sullivan I posted displays whiter in the scan than on the actual card. I have an ungraded partial set in VG-EX and the backs go from white to cream, but it really appears to be an aging issue.
__________________
www.MDsportscards.blogspot.com |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|