 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
06-11-2009, 11:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
That might be correct about the Woolly Mammoth hair card being more reliable. For positive verification, the scientist only has to narrow it down to the species. I would assume there are many qualified experts out there who can verify the species of animal, especially considering there aren't many hairy elephants walking around anymore.
Last edited by drc; 06-11-2009 at 12:30 PM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode