![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And just to reiterate - this is an ambiguous issue and up to each seller to decide for themselves how they will handle it. Last edited by Matt; 06-23-2009 at 07:45 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Matt: If you end at a straight 10pm the bidders have no shot to respond to a bid placed right before the 10:01 timestamp. Correct? On the BST, with a hotly contested auction, your screwed if someone gets that last bid in just before the time stamp changes to 10:01. At least with the 5 minute rule, you can react... right? Am I missing something? It sounds like you are saying "get your best bid in by 10:00" but I would think the seller would prefer someone to be able to react against a high bid coming in at the last moment. And I agree, it is an ambiguous issue that is up to the seller and I am basing my thoughts off of Frank's outlined plan. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I'll leave this thread alone at this point; just wanted to clarify that Frank's suggestion doesn't do anything to address Brad's concern. Last edited by Matt; 06-23-2009 at 08:12 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 5 minute rule may not solve the time stamp problem, as mentioned above. However, the 5 minute rule would give bidders who have been outbid the chance to come back with another bid. They have 5 minutes to decide whether or not to put in another bid. In that 5 minutes, some bidders will decide to bid again and some will decide to pass. If nothing else, the 5 minute rule will REDUCE the chances of having issues determining who the winner should be because everyone has more time to decide whether or not to bid. It will not totally eliminate the problem with the time stamp.
As others have mentioned above, it should be the responsibility of the seller to clearly establish the rules of the auction up front. It also should be the responsiblity of the seller to determine the winner in the event of any questions brought on by snipe bids. The moderators should not have to make that decision.
__________________
http://www.bandkgreen.net/baseballcards.htm |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Okay Matt, I will hang it up also. Sorry for the long winded discussion and I was mostly reacting to Frank's plan. I think the seller just needs to be SPECIFIC when there are no hard and fast rules. In Brad's original note, the seller could say "All bids up to and including 10:00pm". With that said, the 10pm bidder would win, 10:01 would not. Really, that is what Brad is saying in his original post. Be specific so there are no fights later. Regards, Michael
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It doesn't matter if it is 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 2 minutes or what... but the seller does need a RULE about it to avoid problems.
I agree with most of what's above. Here, at this site, our time is incremented in minutes. Not minutes and seconds. So if there is a 5 minute rule, and the last bid was at 10:01, any bid that showed a 10:06 posting could be accepted, even if it was actually more than 300 seconds after the post. Precision at this site is by the minute, I think that's what a seller has to go by to minimize problems. And posting a time zone is a must. As for the demise of sniping with auctions here, I think that is a good thing for the seller. It's more like an auction. Think about a real estate auction. They start at a specified time. You have to figure that if they start at 10am there will be a few minutes of preliminaries, and eventually some bidding. The auction doesn't end until the going, going, sold. That's an auction. What eBay does is a hybrid auction, even though they want to call it an auction. An auction here with a 3 or 5 minute rule is much closer to a true auction. Last edited by FrankWakefield; 06-23-2009 at 08:46 PM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|