 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
11-16-2009, 08:28 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Andrew,
I am sure I am going to take a swing and a miss here but regardless of the grade, this is one very nice looking card. Hard to see tiny wrinkles from a scan but I will say an SGC 70/5.5 (Ex+) if there is not a microscopic flaw. But I am guessing you were dinged down lower then this. T-205's can cause the greatest angst over grading. I have seen some realy nice cards in 40,50 holders and then others in higher holders that look like crap. Still a great looking card. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| see if you guys can guess the grade and should i get them graded | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-19-2007 12:44 AM |
| Wanted mid grade to high grade of E97's | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 03-19-2006 10:05 PM |
| Question - To Grade or Not to Grade? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 01-24-2006 01:43 PM |
| Looking for lower grade E95 Plank | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 12-09-2005 10:09 PM |
| Strongly against the "Authentic" grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-01-2002 12:30 PM |
Threaded Mode