![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I figured the stamp idea wouldn't fly.
I guess there is a opportunity to create a system that somehow uniquely identifies a card preventing it from being re-graded without sticking some sort of ink on it, huh? I would love to be able to trust the POP reports. Only safe assumption as to the POP reports is that there is less cards graded than the POP reports reflect because there are PSA and SGC cracked slabs that get crossed over to the other company or cracked and resubmitted raw to the same company. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 05:09 PM |
Grading Compnay Questions | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-11-2008 03:51 PM |
One of the things that's wrong with the current grading system | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 01-28-2007 08:04 AM |
What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 08:42 AM |
Starting a Grading Company | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 06-22-2004 10:57 AM |