![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
"When submitting crossover you must state a minimum grade you will accept for each crossover."
So how did Dan do a large submission with NO minimum grade? ![]() ![]()
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Submitting a minimum grade is MANDATORY for a cross-over. Rather this is a box that has to be submitted or noted. Yes; Dan SHOULD have noted what he wanted -- but I'll also say, and I thought I read this about Michael's booth work (I could be wrong) in this thread, that a few seconds from Brian, other than accepting the order, might have saved this whole scenario.
Even Brian saying something like: "You do understand that your grades may all be lower than what they are in the PSA slabs based on what our graders see" is perfectly acceptable. Jeff L. I tend to agree with you on this: If I had to put a blame percent: Dan 90-95%; SGC 5-10%. At some point, like my original sentence said; DAN HAS to take responsibility Regards Rich |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The best we can hope for from the grading services is consistency- both in grading cards, and how submitters are treated. Jeff did remind us about one major collector of PSA cards who resubmitted his massive collection for half grade bumps, and was literally given the royal treatment as hundreds of them got bumps and not a single one a downgrade. Everyone agreed that was simply not fair (I know anyone can resubmit for a half bump but when you give them 5000 cards you get the VIP treatment).
All that happened to Dan, as frustrating as it was to him, is that SGC gave his cards a close look and believed they were overgraded. Again, it would be nice if the criteria for grading were standard, but each service has its own view on how cards should be assessed. If there's one thing we learned from this thread it's that the crossover game is a risky one, without the proper safety nets in place. Last edited by barrysloate; 05-19-2010 at 08:13 AM. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
selling off my 1941 playball dupes all sgc | where the gold at? | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 03-13-2010 02:05 AM |
SGC T205s (mostly 10s, 20s) for Sale | obcbobd | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 8 | 02-26-2010 08:18 AM |
FS:17 T-206, T210 Weems, W514 Gandil all SGC Graded | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 08-19-2007 09:31 AM |
1962 Topps Football HIGH GRADE SGC Graded and Proof's | Archive | Everything Else, Football, Non-Sports etc.. B/S/T | 8 | 07-27-2006 04:31 PM |
SGC 1887 N28 Allen & Ginter Baseball and more | Archive | 19th Century Cards & ALL Baseball Postcards- B/S/T | 1 | 05-15-2005 04:18 PM |