Crossovers From SGC's Perspective

[Peter_Spaeth]

"We will never assume that a customer will accept a lower grade. Any cards that are lowered as part of the crossover service are done so because the customer has consented to it."

So does this mean Dan consented? And if so what is he complaining about?

[QUOTE=Peter_Spaeth;809741

So does this mean Dan consented? And if so what is he complaining about?[/QUOTE]



Of course he did thats why he didn't bother with the minimum grade on the crossed cards.

[edhans]

A thoughtful, thorough and well written statement of SGC's position. Your product and service is far and away the best in the industry. Thank you Brian.

[Jacklitsch]

Don't know whether this will add to the discussion but...

Back in 2006 a former board member and I conducted an experiment. I took 10 SGC "AUTH" T206 cards, cracked them out, and submitted them to PSA. The bet was on the over/under as to what PSA would do. My buddy was so sure that PSA would reject most, if not all, that he agreed to pay the grading fees of more than two passed muster.

The results: (Remember all 10 were graded "AUTH" by SGC)

2 PSA 4 (Including a McGraw)
3 PSA 5 (Including Speaker) and
1 PSA 6

6 out of 10 received numerical grades.