![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Would you pay more for eye appeal over the assigned grade? | |||
No, I'll only pay fair market value based on the assigned grade |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 4.21% |
Yes, I'll pay slightly more for a "high end" card |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 34.74% |
Yes, I'm willing to place a significant premium on a well centered and/or above average looking card |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
58 | 61.05% |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My vote. "Yes, I'm willing to place a significant premium on a well centered and/or above average looking card". I have some T206 HOF portraits on my site that are in my personal collection that I've paid way up for that couldn't be replaced as far as eye appeal goes, even when compared to much higher graded examples. On the flip side, there are many a collector that wouldn't pay any more than what VCP values them at, which I think is a shame. Just my take.
__________________
Tony Andrea |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
VG E96 card with great eye appeal. Reduced | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 11-30-2007 08:37 PM |
Who SHOULD command the highest premium? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-22-2006 10:32 PM |
Uncatalogued Christy Mathewson Photo Premium | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-22-2005 04:11 PM |
cards with best eye appeal | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 10-13-2002 12:41 AM |
eye appeal... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 08-26-2002 08:23 AM |