![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
After seeing that Gypsy Queen Pujols I wanted to laugh. They should have at least tried to make it look like a Gypsy Queen card by using a more sepia type of image. I did like the 56 Topps style card of Cobb.
Overall, I figure that the attempts to recreate the vintage look isn't too bad. It might actually get collectors interested in the "real" part of the hobby. I shouldn't bash or look down upon modern material collectors. To each their own.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
1920's "W" cards - why bad image ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 04-15-2007 06:36 PM |
1920's "W" cards - why bad image ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 04-15-2007 12:59 PM |
Phantom Values of Baseball Cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-07-2005 12:20 AM |
Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |