October 2010...Still claiming to own or have owned this Nichols.
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...light=insights
Post # 8 Abravefan11
“The Sweet Caporal No. 649 set has 34 cards.”
Post #14 Ted Z
“Jim & Tim Sorry to differ with you guys. But, the SWEET CAPORAL 150 Factory #649 sub-set consists of 35 subjects. I put this sub-set together years ago, and there are 35 cards in it. I've sold many of them since.”
This example is not a mistake this is not a human error, this is fraud or dishonesty for those of you who chalk this up to a “mistake” in the case of this Sweet Cap 649 mission accomplished boast and list from Ted Z.
Here we go another example from October 2010 where Ted claims to have the card but actually uses his 35 card not 34 as it should be currently listed set to not only ignore valid debates from fellow collector, but lend credibility to his own theory on the printing process.
Ted says he has an engineering mind and can remember all sorts of front back combos. Yet now he can’t recall a card that he has been caught faking scans of and talking about for years on this forum? The very card that he has told countless collectors privately he owned yet could never produce except in here with the aid of a computer. Now it’s a card he may have imagined back in the day what does that even mean?
Readers should also read the thread and see how condensing Ted was towards Tim C in this thread as Tim tried to have a friendly discussion and provide his points. Note the “You damn well” and other tones.
Cheers,
John
05-11-2011, 11:24 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode