![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd go with SGC as well, but with one exception.
If you're keeping the cards I'd stay with SGC. If they're lower grade and you plan on selling them I'd just do SGC for the hof/stars and maybe not grade the commons. A grade means a bit more money since there's less worry about alterations etc. But I figure F-G is pretty recognizeble to pretty much anyone. The difference on a common is probably less than the grading fee. If there are any that are really amazing, enough to attaract a registry guy, PSA might be better. I'd probably grade the Pet cards with SGC even if they were pretty beat. Steve B |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exciting New Hobby Find - 1893 Just So Tobacco Buck Ewing! | Andy Baran | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-11-2009 07:30 PM |
NEWLY Discovered Tobacco Card FInd Brunswick Maryland | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 05-14-2009 02:45 PM |
Question about grading complete sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 02-25-2009 07:31 PM |
SOT 1948 Leaf boxing Cards Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-18-2007 10:57 AM |
Another grading question. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2004 08:00 AM |