|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'll go with 1953 Topps. Great player selection, nice Kodachrome accentings, great reverses AND the player is identified on the front.
James |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting question. I recall opening wax packs of both sets as a kid, and then as now, the stunning photographic impact of the Bowmans was hard to resist. The '53 Topps were more plentiful in my area, but the drawings - ok, paintings - seemed like a pale imitation of earlier Bowman issues. I recall other schoolyard collectors felt the same way, placing a higher value on the photo images. I've always thought that Topps was still somewhat unsure of itself in the card industry at that time, and the boardroom decison was to go with something closer to what their successful competitor was doing. And then, the Bowman designers outflanked them by producing a set of beautiful photographs instead of line-drawings. The irony of course is that the cost undid Bowman and paved the way for its exit from the field.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AMAZING autographed sports card find! first batch bb commons | JasonD08 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 02-26-2011 10:52 PM |
| Nice selection of vintage singles 1950-1980 | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-18-2009 10:08 PM |
| 1950-1980 singles(baseball) | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 06-15-2008 11:08 PM |
| 1951-1980 baseball singles/items | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-07-2007 11:12 AM |
| FS: BIG SELECTION 1950-1980 BASEBALL | Archive | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-08-2007 11:07 AM |