 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
12-14-2011, 09:40 AM
|
||||
|
||||
my take
I think we need to start with how Burdick classified them and then go from there. Everything after Burdick is only others' takes on what he did and their try at organizing the sets better. For those that still think T213-1 are actually T206, you are plainly wrong. If you go with that philosophy then W600 HAS to be M600...and there are a ton more. We can either do what Sugar and Egan tried or we can leave them alone (which I vote for). I am NOT saying Burdick didn't make mistakes; he did. It's just that I don't think we should be correcting only the ones that fit our fancy and we are interested in, we need to do them all or not. And my vote, and all of the official guides and catalogs votes, are to leave them the way they are. As for E92, regardless of the back, they are all E92. Same thing goes for E94, they are all Close Candy.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For sale - Vintage Football cards - RAW & GRADED - Sets, Singles, Partial Sets | Shouldabeena10 | Football Cards Forum | 4 | 09-24-2012 11:02 AM |
| F/S: My T206 Collection HOFers and Rare Backs Included | wilsonic89 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 9 | 06-17-2010 10:27 AM |
| T206 set collectors, what is your focus when it comes to obtaining cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 09-10-2006 01:06 AM |
| Collecting Exclusive Series of the T206 Set | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 01-13-2006 07:13 PM |
| t206 backs, mainly | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-03-2005 05:55 AM |
Threaded Mode