 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15
12-14-2011, 06:43 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I'll whirl.....
The Schmidt appears to have glue stains on the back side. Thus, it got hammered by an experience grader who mercifully gave it a "2." While the Duffy, despite the obvious tobacco(?) stains and rounded corners received a "2.5" by some rookie grader who had only been on the job for a week, By the way, I totally concur with what Fred said in the previous post. Lovely Day... 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| A New Idea for Grading Photographic Cards | barrysloate | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-02-2011 10:10 AM |
| Grading discussion- Revolutionizing :) the hobby... | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 70 | 11-19-2010 03:17 PM |
| Should Seller Reimburse Buyer For Grading Fees? | Buythatcard | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-24-2009 11:08 PM |
| What is it, exactly, about grading? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 07-27-2006 09:42 AM |
| Grading Co. Burlesque | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 06-12-2003 10:18 PM |
Threaded Mode