 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
12-22-2011, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I'm more of a PSA fan but I like SGC too. SGC does have variation flaws in their population reports. I only keep track of the T206 reports and if a card has a portrait and batting card, sometimes it will list the one for batting so does that mean the one without a variation listed is all portraits? I don't think so. Maybe SGC would know. It's as if SGC didn't know there were 524 T206 card fronts and what players had more than one card when they first started grading the cards.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: 45 SGC T206 (HOF, SL, Black Sox) | t206hound | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 13 | 03-20-2011 03:57 PM |
| sgc population reports | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 02-19-2005 06:47 PM |
| SGC grading company report. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 36 | 01-09-2005 09:20 AM |
| SGC N172 Population Report - a little history | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-23-2004 02:47 PM |
| Help with T206 Population Report | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 11-16-2002 11:21 AM |
Threaded Mode