![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It doesn't look trimmed, from the scan, to this untrained eye. That being said this is my one and only post in this thread. I am just not going to get into a debate about it. I will let ya'll. I am merely saying it doesn't look trimmed to me, from the scan posted.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I respect that Leon on another note since it looks good to you I have handfull EXMT-NM cards for the next B&L.
![]() Last edited by wonkaticket; 03-21-2012 at 08:39 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim--I think one of us is supposed to say "jinx". Scot
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
can someone please explain to this newb, what you see from that picture/scan that so convinces many that it's trimmed. I'm sure I'm not the only one who doesn't have the experiance to tell.
Rich |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rich,
Planks are found with 2 backs. So far we perceive that all Piedmont 150 Planks show signs of being hand cut. This Plank that is offered is a Piedmont 150. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I think Rich is asking WHAT signs do you see that show it is trimmed??? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
thanks dan |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Are all of the cards in the auction from the same collection? And were they all graded "together"? I'm going to assume, for the moment, that the answer to both of those questions is yes.
There are 38 cards in the auction that are slabbed Authentic. From a quick glance, this includes at least four HOF (including a Cobb) and five Southern League players. For those who believe that the Plank, Magie, Cobb and/or others are trimmed yet received numerical grades: Is it your opinion that the TPG intentionally ignored signs of trimming on these cards (but not the 38 they slabbed "A")... or that they simply missed the evidence of trimming when examining these particular raw cards? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, that is a tough call.
Can you miss something on a Plank and Magie when you should be giving them the most attention? Can you miss a very obvious hack job on the Green Cobb which is also one of the main cards in the most popular T206 set? I have my own opinions |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I don't think it matters much - we all know that the grading companies slab altered cards with numbers, and we all know the reasons. None of this should be surprising since the problem started when a slabbing company was birthed solely for the purpose of giving legitimacy to an illegitimate card. That was sort of a huge clue as to what was to come. The only thing that's important here is whether or not there are, in fact, factory Plank Piedmont 150's. I think this particular card is going to get tossed into the same 'slabs of infamy' pile as the Gretzky Wagner, even if it doesn't deserve to be. The slabbing companies have only themselves to blame - slabbing trimmed cards in the past, and slabbing that green Cobb in the same auction as this questionable Plank, is not helping their case. I believe SGC thinks they got the Plank right. Maybe they did.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Where have all the T206 uncut sheets gone.... ? | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 73 | 01-21-2012 11:10 AM |
My T206 Plank theory....and, what's your guess ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 112 | 02-08-2007 11:43 AM |
t206 Plank and Magie | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 01-25-2006 12:33 PM |
t206 Plank and Magie on ebay? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-15-2003 03:43 PM |
Magie Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 05-17-2002 01:47 PM |