|
|
#51
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'd like to be an optimist and hope that this leads to less buying the flip and not the card, though I'm not holding my breath.
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
#52
|
||||
|
||||
|
PSA still lists 6 qualifiers on their website 2 required and 4 optional
June PSA Pop Report shows these cards were added with qualifiers: 1914 CJ #82 Cravath 1Q 1914 CJ #99 Chance 3Q Like Packs stated in an earlier post why does a PSA 1 deserve a qualifier? Also I never understood the Registry awarding more points for a PSA 1.5Q than a PSA 2Q and a PSA 2Q being equal to a PSA 1Q pointswise
__________________
Tony Collecting: 1909-1911 T206 Southern Leaguers 1914 Cracker Jack Set (96 out of 145) |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Putting PSA to the test? | mferronibc | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 12-22-2019 09:34 PM |
| Anyone putting a PSA order in | kamikidEFFL | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 11-09-2014 08:49 PM |
| Set You Had Most Fun Putting Together | darkhorse9 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 35 | 03-06-2012 12:47 PM |
| Putting together an almost raw monster... | kllrbee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-29-2011 11:12 AM |
| im putting in my resume to PSA | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 08-04-2010 05:25 PM |