|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: jackgoodman
Ok- besides the obvious answers, can someone explain why a trimmed Lajoie went for $19000. while a PSA 1 went for $7000? I know the card is rare, but should trimming be rewarded with a better price because the card "looks" better? Should I get out my paper-cutter? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: Jon Canfield
The question should be... in a PRO 10 worth more than a PSA 1?! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: scott brockelman
1st the Authentic looks nicer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Can someone explain the thinking - REA lots 303 & 305??
Posted By: aro13
I would not be at all surprised is this card ends up in a holder with a numerical grade and as Scott said it still presents really well even if it always stays in an authentic holder. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1970 Topps #303 Error | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 13 | 04-05-2009 06:22 AM |
1970 Topps #303 Error | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-01-2009 09:11 PM |
REA T206 Lots | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 05-05-2008 08:43 AM |
REA auction partners-- lots 122 and/or 192 | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-26-2007 11:58 AM |
REA question regarding ungraded lots | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 04-09-2006 03:01 PM |