|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Anonymous
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: barrysloate
I think $230,000 is more than reasonable for a schedule that looks like it's falling apart. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Jim VB
Ummmm. I don't know. $230,000 seems a little high. It does have pencil writing inside... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: anthony
i would agree that it is pretty rare but it's not a first edition charles dickens... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: barrysloate
The seller also says it was supposed to have belonged to the owner. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: dennis
$50.00 would be a generous offer. imo |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: barrysloate
Well, it was supposed to belong to the owner so I added an extra sawbuck! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Paul
The owner of what? The National League? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Ed Hans
He's got his decimal points out of whack. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Mike Mccullough
The seller will throw in a Babe Ruth Calender card for the winner. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: JimB
That book is not worth a dime more that 220k. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Marc
This reminds me of this local goof where I live who keeps advertising his T206 cards in the paper. He says he found 3 of them under a mantle in an old house and is asking for $1200 or trade for a Mustang or Camaro. He writes "RARE", "100 Years Old". So, I call him up this past summer thinking he must have a Ty Cobb, W. Johnson, etc. Nope, he has a Howie Caminitz, Jimmy Sheckhard, and a Larry Doyle. When I asked him on the phone what players he had, he said, "Oh, I don't know off hand, they are upstairs in my safe...I'll have to go look. Why, what does it matter, they are 100 years old?" I told him it does indeed matter in value. After he told me those three names he asked what they were worth. I told him they were worth maybe $50 a piece...and to be quite honest that is inflated and quite generous. I've seen those three for $20 a piece many times. After I told him that, he said I was crazy and that there has to be a collector of these things who would pay that. I told him I was a collector. He still wanted $1200 or a Camaro or Mustang. I just laughed at him and said, "Good luck getting that! I told you what they are worth." |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Jared
Marc, |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: davidcycleback
It's safe to say a signed T206 Honus Wagner does not exist. An autographed 1933 Goudey Lajoie exists, though, which many (including myself) would say is the best autographed baseball card in the hobby. Was part of the Barry Halper collection. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: Jim VB
For the record, this seller has adjusted his BIN price, downward, by about 93%! Now that's a sale! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
is this a ridiculous price?
Posted By: barrysloate
A starting bid of $9.95 and a bin of $50.00 would be more appropriate. He's still a tad high. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
is this a ridiculous price? | Archive | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 2 | 09-09-2007 05:31 PM |
is this a ridiculous price? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-09-2007 02:28 PM |
This is getting ridiculous | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 11-27-2003 07:24 AM |
Now this is truly ridiculous | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 11-17-2003 03:26 PM |
THIS IS RIDICULOUS | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 08-06-2003 12:11 AM |