![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I have quite a few different sized postcards, with all kinds of backs, and have never seen one like that.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
A real photo postcard is just a photograph that was developed on a thicker paper stock with a postcard back. If I had to guess about this one, I would think that maybe the printer ran out of regular photo paper and used a sheet of postcard paper instead. Or they might have done it accidentally. Either way, I personally wouldn't consider it a "double postcard." Just a printing (as in the stock it was printed on) anomaly.
-Ryan |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ballpark, Team & Player Postcards Boston, Boston & Boston T206 - 190/524 |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
So aside from the back anomaly, if it were printed on regular photo stock, what would it be referred to as? Any ideas as to who produced it or when it was issued?
__________________
Ebay Store and Weekly Auctions Web Store with better selection and discounts Polite corrections for unidentified and misidentified photos appreciated. Rude corrections also appreciated, but less so. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I looks like a "premium" of some sort, more than just a photograph. Awesome piece.
-Ryan |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think Ryan nailed it. Don't do this, but I bet it would be worth more if you cut off the bottom half and called it a 'one-of-a-kind' Ruth postcard.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
First off - that is an awesome piece.
Now for the sarcasm... perhaps you could cut it in two and have (2) Ruth PCs. You'd have Ruth's upper half and lower half PCs. Sorry for the smart a$$ remark - Honestly, that is a truly nice piece.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I was actually being serious - the upper half would resemble a believable Ruth photo, enough to where it would probably be quite valuable. As-is, it looks like a premium with a messed-up back.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: T206 Double Name & Double Factory *SOLD* | t206blogcom | T206 cards B/S/T | 3 | 08-06-2013 11:52 AM |
Rppc | bigfish | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-23-2010 08:03 PM |
RPPC player ID help | dbrown | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 07-17-2010 09:38 PM |
Say It Ain't So - RPPC | Matt | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2009 01:02 PM |
Need Help Identifying RPPC | DixieBaseball | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 11-30-2009 10:19 PM |