![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Here's what some people don't get, and I will use myself as an example to illustrate the point:
I collect something other than cards. It's not my main focus but every several months I will look to splurge on some of these items. They are readily available on ebay, often for much cheaper than I wind up spending on them. But I am not super knowledgable on the market nuances for these items; I am not sure who the legit sellers are, and who is selling knockoffs, or how prevalent knockoffs are, though I suspect quite prevalent. So what I do, is instead of bargain hunting on ebay through various sellers of unknown reputation, I willingly and happily pay top dollar and then some to get what I want, in one shot, from one guy whom I know is 100% legit, selling legit stuff. And if he were to run auctions, I would only buy these items from him, and slug it out with other bidders, including those like myself-- who are loyal to this guy. I know I may in some cases be paying way over what I could find these items for elsewhere, but I am too busy to learn the seller landscape and am happy to pay a fat premium for what I want and the confidence in what I am getting, when I buy from this one point of sale. Now if this is how one guy thinks with respect to one seller of a collectible, there are doubtless legions of others with the same mindset. And though I know how to parse a good card from a bad one no matter who the seller, there are likely many guys who think about cards the way I do about this other collectible. This explains why some guys who have built a business, a reputation, and a following on a mass scale (the Probsteins, the PWCCs, the Morris, the Novellas, etc.) seem to get bidding and action that others don't. Many people are busy with work or other things and just want what they want, and are happy to "overpay" for confidence in seller and the items' legitimacy. Other sellers who do not get the same action should look to market themselves accordingly, so that they can enjoy the same benefits of a loyal following. Last edited by MattyC; 03-22-2014 at 05:07 PM. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Switching to a different board and a different seller:
A PSA board "insider" posted a thread thanking Probstein for getting him a very strong price on a 1973 Clemente in PSA 9; yet no one accused the bidding on that song of being shilled yet a weekly thread seems to be created about probstein shills. C'mon now, no one thought of that with that posting. I think Matty said it well, when people have faith and confidence in an auction house sometimes fluky things happen. Perhaps Larry you would like to try the services of Bassik and Morris Rich |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
thats ok...probstein pwcc gregmorris bassik hyee heritage etc etc
if it looks like a duck its a duck |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1964 topps tatoos variations | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-16-2012 07:09 PM |
1964 topps tatoos | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-13-2012 08:08 AM |
1964 topps tatoos needed | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-30-2012 06:52 PM |
1964 topps tatoos wanted | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 01-21-2012 12:09 PM |
1960 Topps Tattoos and 1964 Tatoos | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 04-08-2008 10:10 PM |