|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
cause if it wasnt a real holder why would they make it look so different..i assume its from an old error with the # by itself but was just wondering if that was standard at some time cause i havent seen any others.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is the link to the thread on the MANY DIFFERENT PSA SLABS:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=120512 Perhaps just a #, because the T206 did not have a number??? |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
right but no other T206s' i have seen with just a #
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| psa holder question | baker85 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 01-03-2014 10:37 PM |
| SGC Holder Question | ins02 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 10-28-2013 04:01 PM |
| Baseball holder question | mravk | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 4 | 06-13-2012 09:33 PM |
| PSA Holder Question.. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 06-10-2006 06:15 PM |
| E96 holder question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 11-28-2005 09:59 PM |