|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Pat R.
We have gone thru this numerous times in past threads over the years.
You cannot compare Schmidt Lithographic's (San Francisco) printing methods and machinery used to produce the OBAK's with American Lithographic's (NYC) printing methods & machinery that produced the T206's, T205's, T209's, T210's, T211's, T213's, T214's and T215's. Where is your evidence that supports you making this claim ? Furthermore, mathematically speaking, tell us how your "17" (or whatever) format maps into the following T206 structures ? ? 150 Series ------------- 150-only group = 12 subjects 150/350 series = 144 subjects 350-only series = 204 subjects ------------------ 350/460 series = 60 subjects....plus the 6 super-prints (which were usually Double-Printed) ------------------ 460-only series ------------------ Exclusive 12 group = 12 subjects Subjects printed only with 460 type backs = 36 Southern Lgrs. = 48 subjects ----------------- Hey guys............ It does not require Rocket Science to see that the common denominator in all these Series structures is a factor of 12. TED Z . |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Simulated 108-card sheet of the Sovereign 350 "apple green" series
Illustrated here is my concept of a 12 x 8 rows arrangement of the 66 subjects that we know American Litho printed together on one sheet. Note the 6 super-prints are shown Double-Printed.
I intended to Double-Print all 72 cards on a longer sheet comprising of 144 cards. But, the Net54 scan limit per post is 18 scans....therefore, only 108 cards are depicted. v................................................. .................................................. ............... 19" wide x 24" long sheet .................................................. .................................................. ................v v................................................. ....... Six super-prints ............................................v TED Z . |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Ted,
Where did I ever mention 17 ? Actually I think they were printed on a few different size sheets but that's just my opinion and your 12 factor is no different. It's a number that only fits in a few places without forcing it to fit. Patrick |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
W515-1 Strip Card Printing Plate? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-04-2016 05:29 PM |
Looking for w519, w572 and other Strip-card/ "W" printing errors/oddities | shammus | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 09-27-2013 11:50 PM |
W517 printing process- Horizontal vs Vertical | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-08-2013 04:54 PM |
1910 W-UNC strip card Cobb for trade | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, W, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 04-12-2008 06:07 PM |
Ted Z - Chase, Matty, and Johnson were on the same printing sheet | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 69 | 06-06-2007 04:18 PM |