|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the response, I appreciate it. The back really isn't shiny, it's just my bad phone. I was trying to take a good picture but it didn't work too well. Anyways, the back is rough and dull.
I usually go for graded cards too if I'm going high-dollar but these were in a lot of other cards I knew to be authentic so I went for it. The corners have me concerned too but they do look natural up close. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
This will sound stupid, but do they smell old?
I ask because I recently purchased '48 REPRINTS and the definitely smell different than the original 48's I own.
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, they do smell old!
I was going to put that in my original post but I didn't want to sound like a weirdo. The first thing I did was smell them when I opened them up today - LOL. They have a VERY distinct "old smell." |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Ha, nice! I think it's easy to duplicate color, fake wear and round corners....but that smell...that only comes with age!
__________________
Working on the 1957 Topps set. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Deron-- you do not sound like a weirdo, but smelling around with Andrew could get you there.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
But an 80-year-old with a smart-phone in his pocket set on vibrate complicates things, huh?
![]()
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the responses so far guys.
I'm leaning towards them being authentic at this point. Anyone else have any thoughts on them? |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for the responses so far guys.
I'm leaning towards them being authentic at this point. Anyone else have any thoughts on them? |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
That's not stupid. It's the first thing I check when confronted with a card I'm not sure about.
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Here is my thought, and I don't mean it to sound snarky, so I apologize if it does:
PSA SGC BVG Any of them will readily answer the authenticity question better than any of us can from a scan.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Yes, I'm well aware that they can and I submit most of my cards to SGC. However, that comes with a fee. A fee that I'd like to avoid losing on a fake card if I can get some free opinions here on something that may be obvious to some because it is something that I am not familiar with. That's all I was looking for.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think people looking at a scan on a computer is about as trustworthy as any grading company. Way, way too many mistakes to trust them
__________________
[FONT="Lucida Sans Unicode"]CampyFan39 |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Exactly. I'm just looking for opinions here before I would waste my money.
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| wtb, 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio | Peter_Spaeth | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 03-12-2014 02:16 PM |
| 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio PSA 2.5 | sycks22 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 08-28-2013 08:00 PM |
| FS 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio 4.5 | Peter_Spaeth | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 07-19-2013 01:26 PM |
| 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio PSA VG-EX+ | Peter_Spaeth | Ebay, Auction and other Venues Announcement- B/S/T | 0 | 07-17-2013 12:17 PM |
| PSA 5 1948 Leaf Joe Dimaggio | Peter_Spaeth | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 12-12-2010 08:57 AM |