|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
AGREED...upon further review! I DID say NOT BETTER THAN, but you are right!
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
That's a pretty nice 4, Bobby. I'm not sure if there's some sort of wrinkle that downgraded that card, but it looks nice enough for a 5 or even 6. I wouldn't be totally surprised if Bob's card got a 4MK even with a surface wrinkle. I think you saw the 3.5 for the T206 that was graded earlier today on the main forum.
Last edited by glchen; 12-17-2015 at 01:08 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Last edited by bobbyw8469; 12-17-2015 at 02:24 PM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
And no...no surface wrinkle or anything. You can see really huge scans on the auction. I'm pricing it high, because it looks way better than a '4'. It's worth every penny.
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA grading question | ajjohnsonsoxfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 09-02-2015 11:08 AM |
psa grading question | milkit1 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-06-2014 08:58 PM |
Grading Question... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 10-13-2007 10:36 AM |
SGC grading question (possible dumb question) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-08-2006 12:36 AM |
SGC grading question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 03-14-2006 04:31 AM |