|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
I would have to agree that crappy / non-scanner pictures are a pet peeve for me, although they are generally tolerable for graded cards unless the seller is really rushing or just has no clue what they're doing with a phone camera. Also there are times when a picture misrepresents the color / brightness of a card - either for better or worse. ('59 Topps Mays I bought which looked ok in the scan, but duller than a bad penny in hand...)
Also not keen on folks who cannot post a scan of the back of a mid-grade card. What caused that EX looking card to get a PSA 2? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Bowman / Topps Cubs team sets. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BST Pet Peeve | Minerscoin | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-05-2009 05:48 AM |
O/T Pet Peeve on Best Offers (Ebay) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 116 | 12-23-2007 03:47 PM |
B/S/T pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 05-17-2006 08:58 PM |
' Pet Peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 11-07-2003 04:24 PM |
pet peeve | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 09-14-2003 04:26 PM |