|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Interesting info thanks.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
For P42's, I typically expect to pay 10x - 15x the price of a common back in the same condition. Some fool
paid almost 1800 (including bp) for this P42 Willetts in the recent Wheatland Auction.
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I can see I have a lot to learn if I ever decide to pick up more than a few t206s here and there. I appreciate the great responses and information.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
anytime! I love to share info on t206.....just email (anyone) with any questions you may have.....if I can't answer them, I know who will
![]() Craig......you are one of my mentors
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
btw.....beautiful willetts! as you of all collectors know, one of the "tufer" 42's
combos....and not to confuse the issue....a BEAUTIFUL dark back... did we ever finish the dark vs. light or "baby blue" 42 color distribution??? craig??? me and you we working on this at one point I think??![]()
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
craig_w67217@yahoo.com |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks my friend!
don't be so modest ....... you are one of the most knowledgeable t206 collector/researchers we have! THANK GOD you are back to posting. ....your posts were missed very much by me and everyone else.....scot is an animal when it comes to T206....another mentor of mine my research indicated about a 50/50 split in the "light" vs" "dark" or , as I call them, piedy 42 baby blue and piedmont "blue" or the darker blue ones .....at first, when I collected them, I thought they were exlusively printed in the "baby" blue and that how I would spot them "in the wild" at first glance on ebay.....then after a while, I noticed the "dark" blue ones.....I thought they were "rarer" than the baby blues.....after many years of collecting, I noticed it was almost split 50/50 in the distribution of light vs. dark....other collectors also contributed....was pretty neat to "discover" the differentiation.... subjects, I noticed, where printed mostly in both......no "exclusive" players attached to either a dark or light blue piedy 42 ![]() are you going to the national?? would love to meet up with you....i'll be brining the "circus"....I want you to see so bad! please email me when you get a chance.....id love to chat ........very excited to have you back posting....
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() One of my favorites in the set!
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81% 49/76 HOF's 64% 18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90% 22/39 Unique Backs 56% 80/86 Minors 93% 25/48 Southern Leaguers 52% 6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60% 237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW Excel spreadsheets only $5 T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!! Checklists sold (20) T205 8/208 3.8% |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
thanks for posting!!!.........but I think the "baby blue" 42 's don't match the shade of the "light" blue uzits
??????? I may be totally wrong??????????????????.....someone please post a comparison
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Oh No! Not another T206 Question! | iggyman | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 12-02-2011 10:47 AM |
| Another T206 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 08-27-2008 01:30 AM |
| A t206 set Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 03-01-2008 09:03 AM |
| T206 question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 32 | 04-26-2007 08:34 PM |
| T206 Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 06-25-2002 05:40 PM |