![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe it's ridiculous.
I find 6's that are nicer than 7's, and 8's that would be lucky to grade a 7. Unless someone is into the grade, I see it as wasted money. The card needs to justify the grade, and the price. The images pictured are a great example. The 8 has much better centering than the 9. And the color between the two is more likely due to the scanner. I imagine the color is very similar for both cards.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! Last edited by KCRfan1; 05-27-2016 at 08:58 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It all depends on the purpose of the purchase. If for collecting, it's stupid. If for resale, it may not be.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the only way to acquire a card like that is to overpay.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Says one who would know?
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and yet to be disappointed.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
If you buy the 8 today, with the way key RCs are exponentially increasing in value, in a few weeks the 8 will be worth what the 9 is today. Plus, without the flip, it would be tough to tell which card is which.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm pretty much purchasing to collect so I'd go w/the 8 in this example. I can't see paying that much more just because it's a 9 (now that's just based upon the two you pictured). There are instances, like I said just for collecting purposes, that I'd pay a premium just because the card is just that much nicer.
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think you were probably correct...
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My 52 yr old eyes see no difference between the 2.
I'd take the 8 any day over that 9.
__________________
52 Topps cards. https://www.flickr.com/photos/144160280@N05/ http://www.net54baseball.com/album.php?albumid=922 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Pretty hard to tell much of a difference side by side like that.
__________________
Successful transactions with peter spaeth, don's cards, vwtdi, wolf441, 111gecko, Clydewally, Jim, SPMIDD, MattyC, jmb, botn, E107collector, begsu1013, and a few others. Last edited by pokerplyr80; 05-28-2016 at 09:14 PM. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The 9 looks short.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think the 8 looks better than the 9. I think the card is not only more centered, but more clear as well. Look at the Robinson how the colors are a tad off.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep...the 8 has better registration and therefore a sharper image.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe that everyone is spot-on with the 8 being the better card. Could it be the back is more off, or what I tend to believe is that PSA has dramatically tightened up their grading. As a result, the 8 at one time, would have been a 9. The 9, would be an 8 if graded now.
I have seen some newly 6's that are far sharper than 8's graded years ago. Now I find myself looking at the card AND the registration number before I decide on a card to buy.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I didn't notice that until you pointed it out. Big borders are always good on higher grade cards. Tiny borders on high grade = possible red flag.
![]()
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree!
|
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
btw, to this eye....and it could just be the scan, but the 9 looks to be about 47-53 top to bottom, so maybe that could be an issue.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
To this eye, it is short in the holder and has less border total than the 8.
|
#20
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 1957 Topps PSA Rookies: Drysdale, Herzog, F. Robinson, Kubek, & Brooks Robinson | wilkiebaby11 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 10-15-2015 09:24 AM |
1957 Topps Brooks Robinson | BillP | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 08-19-2015 04:55 PM |
WTB, 1957 Topps Brooks Robinson | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-30-2014 12:14 PM |
wtb 1957 topps brooks robinson | Peter_Spaeth | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 12-06-2013 07:21 PM |
1957 Topps Brooks Robinson RC SGC 7 NM | smrtn240 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 11-04-2013 02:42 PM |