|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I know, I know, paper loss made the t3 a 1.5. But why is this a 2 when there is paper loss, and it is ON THE FRONT OF THE CARD? So paper loss on the front is less egregious than paper loss on the back in a totally innocuous spot?
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OT: Consistent Team Batting Averages | oldjudge | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-26-2015 08:03 PM |
| Consistent grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 09-25-2008 06:09 PM |
| Goodwin Auction T216 Honus Wagner - consistent grading??? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-22-2006 11:58 AM |
| PSA vs. SGC - consistent and accurate? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 02-09-2006 08:14 AM |