 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
07-14-2018, 05:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
I would give the edge to 1966s as being tougher because of super shortprints like Coleman, Snyder, Jackson RC, etc. But make no mistake.....ain't nothing rare about any 1960s Topps card....unless, we're talking test issues of course.
Last edited by Orioles1954; 07-14-2018 at 05:55 PM. 
|
|
#2
07-15-2018, 09:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I personally would move up 64's one group
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Degree of difficulty...T207 backs | Vintagecatcher | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-30-2015 10:30 PM |
| Have fun on ESPN Classic - Ranking all time Best World Series Teams | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 07-05-2006 01:44 PM |
| Ranking the difficulty of nineteenth century issues ? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 05-24-2005 08:29 PM |
| Ranking the difficulty of 20th Century Prewar sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 05-24-2005 08:20 PM |
| Degree of Difficulty: American Beauty Backs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 11-12-2002 09:50 PM |
Hybrid Mode
