PSA Vs. SGC

[ruth_rookie]

Something doesn’t add up with this Buster guy. He says he works nights, which is why he always posts when the rest of us are asleep. Yet he’s working on a high grade Cracker Jack set (PSA/SGC 8-9 from what little I can decipher). He already has “75% of the 1933 Goudey set in PSA 8 or SGC 88” including the Ruth’s. It’s none of my business, but if I had that kinda dough, I wouldn’t be working nights. In fact, I wouldn’t be working at all.

[Empty77]

Originally Posted by ruth_rookie

Something doesn’t add up with this Buster guy. (...)

He also re-replies to himself often, which functions to re-activate the thread on the daily digest of newly updated threads, which is artificial, since if there were still useful points to add on the topic, others would be commenting and it could carry on of its own accord.

Also, b/w this thread and a few others I think I recall, this seems the only topic of fixation.

It seems designed just to bait people into an argument over a topic that is already well-worn...

[Johnny630]

When people say it’s not about the money don’t believe them it’s always about the money lol.

I dont think anyone disputes the higher "market value" of PSA. However, the "exact same quality" of card can be had from SGC for less money which works great for those of us who use binders for raw cards.

We are able to get the same grade cards without paying top market prices.