|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
The solution is to make the penalty for deceptively altering a card so hideous and gruesome that the potential perpetrator gets PTSD just thinking about it.
Other potentially useful techniques were used Clockwork Orange |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
A card found to be altered should be further altered with an inked-on handlebar mustache. And aviator shades.
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The answer is simple -- punish fraudsters. Severely. People commit fraud because they can get away with it, and there are no consequences except getting rich and in many cases adored. We now have a great and perhaps unprecedented opportunity for law enforcement to make a difference. Hopefully they will pursue this aggressively and not let people off the hook with a slap on the wrist.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 06-27-2019 at 08:54 PM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
That will never work, as doing so could open the TPG to legal action.
One of the 1913 Liberty Head Nickels (there are only five of them), was originally deemed to be a fake; it was later proven to be real. If the TPG who deemed it fake, had marked it as a fake, it would have ruined the coin's value, and the company could have been subjected to serious legal action. I also seem to remember hearing within the last year or so, about an Old Master painting, that was said by several "experts" to be a fake. It was later proven to be authentic. Again, if someone had indelibly marked it as a forgery, its value would have been ruined, and the person who erroneously marked it as fake, could have been sued for millions of dollars. Steve
__________________
Successful BST deals with eliotdeutsch, gonzo, jimivintage, Leon, lharris3600, markf31, Moonlight Graham, Mrc32, sb1, seablaster, shammus, veloce. Current Wantlist: 1909 Obak Howard (Los Angeles) (no frame on back) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
If someone defaced my card you can bet that I would be pretty annoyed. An altered card is always accepted by the hobby when graded authentic. There is no reason to guess a person's motivation and deface their card.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
But wait. Then they wouldn't get resubmitted. [Uproarious laughter from fat cats at the PSA boardroom table]
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Talking with someone about that Sotheby's restorer woman, I offered the opinion that all restored/conserved items should be permanently marked, but that she would likely (and perhaps rightly) say she wouldn't have the right to mark someone else's item,
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Last edited by honus94566; 06-28-2019 at 12:34 PM. |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why doesn't the hobby collectively agree that high grade pre-war cards are most likely always altered and pay accordingly? We could collectively drive up collector grade cards without questionable alterations and make those cards more desirable.
Wouldn't this be a lot easier to instill in the hobby than some AI grading service? What really is the difference between a PSA 9 and PSA Authentic T206? One was caught as being trimmed and one wasn't seems to be the assumption. Why not make that accepted fact? If you did that you could take the registry out while you were at it. All it takes is refusing to pay more for anything 8 (or whatever grade you want to establish) and above than you would an authentic card. People will stop doctoring cards in collector grade because the collector grade will be more desirable and registries will become obsolete while nobody chases the top tier anymore. Last edited by packs; 06-28-2019 at 01:01 PM. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by packs; 06-28-2019 at 04:07 PM. |
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
I hear you.
__________________
Four phrases I have coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| There has to be a better solution | SMPEP | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 04-20-2013 08:53 PM |
| A possible solution for the PSA 8 T206 Wagner? | Leon | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 149 | 10-24-2012 01:34 PM |
| The solution to all of these threads- altering? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-01-2006 07:06 AM |
| solution to ethical problems? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 01-17-2005 01:38 PM |
| Pop-Up Ads---A solution | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-28-2002 11:11 AM |