Auction House thievery Lelands style

[sbfinley]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

That will be difficult to produce given that Fed Ex has a 1K limit for collectibles.

I would guess that their insurance is through a 3rd party and whole “we purchase insurance for each individual package we ship through Fedex“ can read that way just as much as you want to read it as “we insure our packages through Fedex.” I could be wrong though. You never know. Just from distance though I see a guy who complained about pricing, was given a discount, and within 48 hours is talking about whipping up a lawsuit. That’s not reasonable to me. The discount changes the parameters of the situation and unless I’m presented evidence that they never insure packages they charge for they aren’t guilty of anything other than having high rates. In that case 90% of the houses I deal with are guilty as well. If new evidence is presented then cool, I’ll change my opinion.

[Peter_Spaeth]

If they have 3rd party insurance I doubt they pay separately for each and every item; more logical to me they would have a fixed fee policy. Could be wrong.

[Republicaninmass]

I too checked my invoices

I complained about an 800 4 card lot having a 28 shipping and insurance.

Kelly wrote back

"Hello ted, it is shipping and Insurance I can take a look at it for you."


I think I just paid it, as there is no further correspondence


3/2017
$1275 shipping 50

10/17
$4592 shipping 80

2/19
$850.shipping $28

[CuriousGeorge]

And that’s why Steven we’re giving them the opportunity to explain their side of the story before we proceed. Thus far all that has happened is a thread that seems to be quite pertinent to the hobby has been moved to the water cooler section and crickets.

Originally Posted by sbfinley

I would guess that their insurance is through a 3rd party and whole “we purchase insurance for each individual package we ship through Fedex“ can read that way just as much as you want to read it as “we insure our packages through Fedex.” I could be wrong though. You never know. Just from distance though I see a guy who complained about pricing, was given a discount, and within 48 hours is talking about whipping up a lawsuit. That’s not reasonable to me. The discount changes the parameters of the situation and unless I’m presented evidence that they never insure packages they charge for they aren’t guilty of anything other than having high rates. In that case 90% of the houses I deal with are guilty as well. If new evidence is presented then cool, I’ll change my opinion.