|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
|
As a person who actually wrote an E&V Column back in the day I can assure you that we all had individual ways of looking at things.
The Thomas NNOF came out of packs that way and it was such an obvious difference that it should have been a variation noted as such in 1990. Instead it did take a couple of years for widespread recognition. I will say even today doing this type of work for COMC I'm more OK than ever with these subtle differences. Even if it's just in printing, if there is enough of a difference I don't mind adding it to the DB. That's on both a knowledge and a business sense. To me the purest variation is something akin to the 1962 Topps Wally Moon card in which the poses are obviously different. The 1961 Fairly is an obvious printing issue but again fairly obvious which is why I'm fine with that one as well. But, in reality, it's sometimes an individual decision but I'll listen to any and all logic on any of these Rich
__________________
Look for our show listings in the Net 54 Calendar section |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1970 topps printing error ? Proof ? Help | MGHPro | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 15 | 09-03-2015 08:23 AM |
| 1970 topps proofs? Printing error ? Help | MGHPro | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 5 | 09-02-2015 03:16 PM |
| 1971 Topps Vada Pinson - Pretty Cool | Gr8Beldini | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 01-29-2015 09:03 AM |
| 92 topps printing error? | TAVG | Modern Baseball Cards Forum (1980-Present) | 2 | 01-12-2015 08:04 AM |
| T206 printing error variations...still considered premiums? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-29-2007 08:49 AM |