![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
OK - Now that I am done bitchin -
Just wanted to say - Mega Kudos to Bobby for puttin these things together - Not many guys out there would invest a year of time and tons of paperwork to put something like this together for FREE.... Thanks Bobby!!
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 172/520 : 32.8% |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I sent in 23 mostly lower grade t206's and they were about what I expected no real surprises either way. 8 - came back the grade I estimated 5 - + 1/2 grade 7 - - 1/2 grade 1 - + 1 2 - - 1 grade The two that stood out the most to me was a Knabe that came back a 3 that I thought was a 2 and a Leifield that came back a 2 that I thought was a 3 when you look at the two together I don't see how the Knabe is a grade higher than the Leifield. Knabe PSA 2.jpg Leifield PSA 3.jpg Last edited by Pat R; 06-10-2021 at 08:56 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
when you look at the two together I don't see how the Knabe is a grade higher than the Leifield.
Yes - Exactly my point!
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 172/520 : 32.8% |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
New graders Pat. That is my suspicion.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
MK and MC qualifiers are not being eliminated, only the OC, OF, ST, and PD.
https://www.psacard.com/articles/art...date-june-2021 So having a MK in the order doesn't mean anything.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
bump so people can see their grades.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So if you go thru and look at all 283 cards - It appears that PSA pretty much hammered everything.
Couple of things come to mind - What constitutes an "Altered Stock" designation - and this is on a 52 Topps fairly common card? What is the difference between "Minimum Size" and "Evidence of Trim"?
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 172/520 : 32.8% |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
However, I thought the "No Qualifiers" was for the entire order, not specific cards. So because you submitted with a group submission, whatever Bobby selected for the submission is what would have mattered to your cards within. Authentic vs. unslabbed Alterations/Minsiz you can select for each card, or at least it was the last time I submitted to PSA.
__________________
-- PWCC: The Fish Stinks From the Head PSA: Regularly Get Cheated BGS: Can't detect trimming on modern SGC: Closed auto authentication business JSA: Approved same T206 Autos before SGC Oh, what a difference a year makes. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can select "no qualifiers" on a line by line basis
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Gauging Interest for PSA piggybacking TICKET STUBS - CLOSED DUE TO LACK OF INTEREST | bobbyw8469 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-04-2018 09:11 AM |
Gauging interest for a PSA Piggyback Special!! | bobbyw8469 | WaterCooler Talk- Off Topics | 23 | 05-07-2017 03:31 PM |
Gauging Interest: Stack of 1970 OPC's for Trade | JollyElm | 1960-1979 Baseball Cards B/S/T | 0 | 04-29-2017 10:45 PM |
Gauging interest....reply if you like the idea | scottglevy | Live Auctions - Only 2-3 open, per member, at once. | 4 | 03-26-2015 08:12 PM |
Gauging interest in a Net 54 virtual Hall of Fame museum | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 10-26-2013 06:49 AM |