Another inexcusable PSA screw up - they graded another reprint!

[ClementeFanOh]

I'll jump on the pile! PSA is lousy, there's a deal with Beelzebub somewhere
that keeps them alive. Trent King

[chadeast]

Yeah, it is pathetic, but I'm also not surprised, even a tiny bit. The CJ Mack permanently changed my opinion and future expectations.

[Arazi4442]

Stunning

[GasHouseGang]

Here are the pictures from Ebay. Not as good as some, better than others.

[brianp-beme]

Originally Posted by GasHouseGang

Here are the pictures from Ebay. Not as good as some, better than others.

Perhaps Leon is interested...I think he is collecting T206 Hall of Famers with extra big borders.

Brian

[BRoberts]

Ryan,

Did you cross over your T206 Wagner from an SGC to a PSA holder?

[Rhotchkiss]

Originally Posted by BRoberts

Ryan,

Did you cross over your T206 Wagner from an SGC to a PSA holder?

I did not. I did cross a Joe Doyle Nat’l and I took a 0.5 grade downward adjustment to do it. I did it bc I wanted maybe the only 100% complete T206 set registered somewhere, and PSA has a great registry (I certainly give them that).

That said, whether I crossed a singular card or not is irrelevant to the fact that there is zero excuse for PSA being incapable of distinguishing a t206 reprint from a real t206. And they charge a lot of money!! And it was not any card, it was a rare back, T206 Cy Young. This is not some chump card. I mean who is looking at these things??!!!

Why can’t they have vintage experts looking at vintage cards? Or at least someone with experience looking at $5k cards?

[Eric72]

$3,700 - my goodness.

I wonder how many times this card will change hands before it gets freed from that holder.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/14408450916...p2047675.l2557