|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
It leaves a shadow and is catching light change so it’s not a marker. It’s plastic. Bad quality control.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
But at least the card was back promptly
__________________
"Trolling Ebay right now" © Always looking for signed 1952 topps as well as variations and errors |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Thanks all Jeff Kuhr https://www.flickr.com/photos/144250058@N05/ Looking for 1920 Heading Home Ruth Cards 1917-20 Felix Mendelssohn Babe Ruth 1921 Frederick Foto Ruth Joe Jackson Cards 1916 Advertising Backs 1910 Old Mills Joe Jackson 1914 Boston Garter Joe Jackson 1915 Cracker Jack Joe Jackson 1911 Pinkerton Joe Jackson Shoeless Joe Jackson Autograph |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
I hope that wasn't a marker.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Based on the last two day's posts you should switch to PSA.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Who else had an issue??? I remember the one guy had a pubic hair in his 1963 Mantle card. Was there someone else?
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Was it Mickey's? If so get it to Ken Goldin pronto.
Last edited by Snapolit1; 01-24-2023 at 08:35 AM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Edited to add - it looks like foreign material from the black insert that is lodged in with the card. Magic marker? probably not.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for. Last edited by Fred; 01-24-2023 at 08:12 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
This happened before Christmas, and yes - I was royally pissed. Total lack of QC, someone should have seen that on the scan if not in hand if any QC had been done at all. I emailed Brent at SGC in a tizzy and told him to refund me (which he did) because I was popping the card. I spent the next few days being pissy on social media and generally disavowing everything about TPG's. (The fact that they also sent me back a '54 Jackie as trimmed did nothing to improve my mood). What's the moral here? I really don't know. At the end of the day, though I am increasingly more into raw lower grade vintage - there are a few cards like that Mantle that I want in a slab. SGC despite their all too human faults - still does this kind of thing less often and has better customer service in general than PSA does. So yeah, I'm trying to be more patient and forgiving here in the new year - and obviously, I'm eating my words right now on my pubed up, Peter Griffin-worthy '63 Mantle. Sorry to the OP that this happened to you on what looks like an otherwise very nice Red Man Mays. To me, that looks like what I see even more often floating around in SGC slabs - it's like a piece of the molding that is used in the inserts? That is hands down the hugest one I've ever seen that got encapsulated and somehow made it past them, if that is what it is. Sad yes, and no excuse. But they are human. And I'm trying to look at things like my own patience, etc. a bit different here in the new year. I have no idea how long it will last, but I'm hopeful... And PS - yeah, you can bang on and rattle SGC slabs all day long if there is something sealed up in there you don't like. It doesn't work. I've never been able to get lint or the black insert shards that you sometimes see to move even a fraction by doing that. The only alternatives seem to be to pop the slab or send back to them for a re-holder.
__________________
Postwar stars & HOF'ers. Bowman Cubs. Junk Wax nostalgia... Last edited by jchcollins; 01-25-2023 at 09:16 AM. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
100% agree
Agree with all previous comments - it is not marker - poor quality control.
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
That's what I was going to say. It would have to be extraordinarily thick ink to cast a shadow.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Marker?
No chance that is marker. It is 3d. Send it back so they can remove the plastic strip. Jeff W
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I'm in the piece of plastic camp. Also, I'm not familiar with SGC's grading process or criteria, but if it was a marker, wouldn't it probably have happened before grading, and knocked it down to less than a 3?
__________________
Signed 1953 Topps set: 264/274 (96.35 %) |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unbelievable! | rdwyer | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 08-27-2015 09:18 AM |
Unbelievable Scam | Rollingstone206 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 05-31-2014 09:38 AM |
Unbelievable! | jthorst75 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 1 | 04-02-2012 06:21 PM |
To me...this is unbelievable! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 01-01-2009 06:20 AM |
This is an unbelievable amount of coin for this card! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 07-15-2005 02:12 PM |