![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is about what I would call it, somewhere between 25-50. I am surprised the answers so far are largely 10 and below; considering what I see routinely referred to as rare around here.
Valuable is separate from rare; rare only measures supply. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I wrote an article about rarity (creatively entitled "Rare..."). My definition of absolute rarity was few of the item in existence, hard to find in any condition at any time.
Absolute rarity is wonderful and complicated all at the same time. On the one hand, when you have a truly rare item, you have something truly special. Of course, the flip side is that the card is going to be a real bitch to replace, if you can replace it at all, should you sell or trade it away. I am not sure I can pick a hard cut-off for absolute rarity, though. I mean if there are 21 examples of a card instead of 20, is it no longer rare? That seems to be an absurdly reductionist way of looking at it. I guess for me the bottom line is that rarity is like obscenity: i can't tell you precisely what it is but I know it when I see it.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 06-23-2023 at 11:41 AM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it is more than the absolute number that exist; it is the absolute number that are circulating. If there are 20 copies of a card that exist but 15 of those are in public collections like the HOF, Burdick Collection, Wharton Tigre Collection, various library collections, etc then the card is rare. If all 20 copies are floating around then it is just scarce.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The most important card in the hobby, the 52 Mantle, is neither scarce nor rare.
Never understood that. Last edited by Snapolit1; 06-23-2023 at 02:38 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It depends on what we are talking about. If it's a type card to start with, then maybe 5 or less is rare, to me.
If it is from a mainstream set, that number can jump greatly. Then, there are other aspects of rarity, such as condition rarity. I hear there are more, vintage high grade cards being made every day....Tip- buy cards with bigger borders.
__________________
Leon Luckey |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
AUTHENTIC--2 PSA 1 / 1.5 -- 50 PSA 2 -- 8 PSA 3 -- 1 PSA 4 -- 2 PSA 5 -- 0 PSA 6 -- 2 PSA 7 -- 1 PSA 8 -- 0 PSA 9 -- 1 PSA 10 -- 0 A fascinating breakdown. You can pound the table all you wish about absolute rarity, and count the Authentics and PSA 1s. Be that as it may, since most of them were issued within the package of frankfurters (having marinated in the not so nice greasy / watery hot dog juice and goo) as a package stiffener, the resultant "free prize" was a less than tantalizing PSA 1 - 2 right from the start. Long to short, when it comes to Stahl-Meyer Franks, CONDITION RARITY CARRIES AN IMMENSE AMOUNT OF WEIGHT (I.E. SPECIAL SIGNIFICANCE). Food for thought. ![]() Last edited by brian1961; 06-24-2023 at 12:13 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Aren't there more than 10 Baltimore Ruths? I think whatever the number is, that card has to be considered rare. You never see it for sale.
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Paul—I believe the number is nine or ten
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
P2 pin rarity? | cubman1941 | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 13 | 02-05-2018 04:21 AM |
Colgan's rarity | Touch'EmAll | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 03-17-2017 10:44 AM |
A rarity indeed | GrayGhost | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 10-21-2009 12:45 PM |
Rarity | Bicem | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 111 | 07-24-2009 12:17 PM |
E103 Rarity | Jason Carota | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-13-2009 07:11 PM |