|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Johnny630- you've completely missed the point. The point is that SGC was
NOT interested in "how well the card would sell" in their holder. Instead, they were properly interested in atoning for a mistake. I am amazed by people who continually moan about grading companies and their urge to one up one another, who then make comments like yours in a public forum. I gave up on PSA long ago, but SGC comparatively seems to have the best interest of their consumers in mind on a more consistent basis. Rather than point to one example of SGC giving a grade you don't like, how about a coherent explanation of what they are supposed to do, that would somehow satisfy you? Or is that dreaming an impossible dream? Geesh. Trent King |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mea Culpa | flkersn | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 1 | 02-18-2014 02:56 PM |
| Sorry Leon, Mea Culpa | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 08-11-2008 06:06 PM |
| mea culpa | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 12-05-2003 02:51 PM |