![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is the 47 written on under the red ink? It's hard to tell from scans, but it appears to be.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I thought the same thing but I refrained from mentioning it, I have blown it up and the 47 appears printed and not drawn in to me.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not have it in hand yet, here is a zoomed in picture hopefully this helps.
It definitely looks like the “47” is under the “100”. Last edited by AP34; 04-02-2024 at 04:44 PM. Reason: Added to post |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
does it appear that the 47 is under the red #100?
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It does to me, and I also think the 47 is printed and not drawn on.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This just keeps getting more strange
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
You wouldn’t happen to have a black light, would you? It would be interesting to put a black light on the 47/100 once you get it.
__________________
“interesting to some absolute garbage to others.” —- “Error cards and variations are for morons, IMHO.” |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Gotta play Devil's advocate here.
Although the "47" seems to be under the "100" at first glance, I dare say it's probably an optical illusion. A magic marker written on top of the red ink would look like that, because the red ink is a bit 'slippery' (for lack of a better word) and the black wouldn't fully cover it. Another thing, if the black was truly under the red, why does the black show through it? That wouldn't happen so easily to a red so bold and thick. Plus, the "47" exhibits the typical 'bleeding' of magic marker writing on non-glossy cardboard. IMG_3150.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() Last edited by JollyElm; 04-03-2024 at 02:50 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1958 Topps Roger Maris - SGC 2 | Tcards-Please | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 05-20-2023 05:19 PM |
WTB/LF 1958 Topps #47 Roger Maris | joeneeley | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-13-2022 06:55 PM |
WTB: 1958 TOPPS ROGER MARIS #47 in a PSA 9 | invest | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 09-07-2020 01:35 PM |
Looking to buy 1958 Topps Roger Maris RC | nicker10 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-04-2016 10:59 PM |
FS: 1958 Topps Roger Maris RC PSA 1 | orioles93 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-01-2013 10:10 PM |